The fire under Native American pottery

November 2026

Good Eye

The fire under Native American pottery

by Peggy Whiteneck

Native American pottery of various authenticity can be found in antique shops. Some of it is simply marked with the word “Dine” (the native term for Navajo, which may or may not indicate authenticity), with not much else to determine maker source. These items can be acquired for just a few bucks, with higher prices reserved to items signed with a known artist’s mark.

Recently, I acquired a very small pot marked in cursive “L. Kee Navajo” and distinguished by what my research discovered was embedded horse hair in the finish. In this Navajo technique, the hair itself combusts on contact with the heat of the furnace but leaves behind the wispy shadow image of the hair.

“Kee” is a common Navajo surname, and I was not able to identify a specific maker for this vase, a common problem in attributing Native pottery. I was surprised by the healthy prices found online for horsehair pottery in general, even with no-name provenance, but I would recommend this style as “buy it if you like it” rather than an “investment” before time has burnished its value.

Native American pottery has been made mostly by women when there have been few economic opportunities available to women. There are some Native American potters, however, who have achieved a national and international reputation.

Joy Navasie (1919-2012)

AKA Frogwoman, Joy Navasie is the second Hopi-Tewa potter to bear that artist name, the first being her mother, Paqua (1890-1955). Both signed their pots with the image of a frog, the signatures being distinguished from one another by Paqua’s frog having distinct straight-line toes while Joy’s have webbing between the toes. Joy and her mother perfected a line of white-slip pottery in a distinctive style and strictly adhering to traditional potting methods.

Joy stopped potting some years before her death. Consequently, there is a finite supply of her work and a strong collector demand for it. Meanwhile, Joy’s several daughters continue the family potting tradition.

Price ranges on Joy’s work run from several hundred dollars to $2,000-$3,000 for the larger pieces such as the one shown here, which measures 3 ½” diameter at the opening, 5.5” tall, and 20” in circumference at its widest point. Painted in black and shades of brown, this example has a painted band at the collar; Navasie often left her pot collars totally white.

This olla has sentimental value to my family because my parents acquired it on a trip to New Mexico that was an anniversary gift from their children. Dad told the tale of a dispute between himself and airline staff about my parents holding the large, cloth-wrapped olla on board the plane for the flight home rather than stowing it in an overhead bin. Dad won.

Joy Navasie’s work is in museum collections, including the Art Institute of Chicago, Crocker Art Museum, Natural History Museum of Utah, Museum of Northern Arizona, Heard Museum, and others.

Coudersport Duck on Nest
A Joy Navasie olla (pot) that I inherited from my parents. (Image courtesy of the author)

Maria Martinez (1887-1980)

A Pueblo artist known especially for her black ware pottery glazed with an etched design, she also did some works in earth-colored clay. Among primitive firing methods used throughout the 20th century, Martinez’s kiln consisted of old tin cans to support wire frames resting into an open fire. Given this method, and others like it used by Native American potters, breakage during firing was a not-uncommon natural disaster!

Serafina Tafoya (1863-1949)

This artist used the “coil method” for constructing pottery, in which coils were rolled, then wound and smoothed out to form the even surface of the pot. Her extensive pottery-making progeny consists of four generations! And like many of the best Naïve American potters, her work is featured in art museums, such as the Mount Holyoke College Art Museum and the Art Institute of Chicago, among others.

These are just a few of the native world’s finest potters, so research if you have pots signed with other names.

 

Peggy Whiteneck is a writer, collector, and dealer living in East Randolph, VT. If you would like to suggest a subject that she can address in her column, email her at  allwritealready2000@gmail.com. ​

The risks of buying antiques online

October 2026

Good Eye

The risks of buying antiques online

by Peggy Whiteneck

With nearly universal expansion of Internet access, a lot of antiquing today happens online rather than on the ground. Despite that trend, I prefer live shopping, in spite of the closure of so many of my favorite live shops.

Most of my collecting interests lie in glass, porcelain, and other ceramics, and I buy these now almost exclusively in live venues unless I’m very familiar with the seller and know they know what they’re selling and how to ship it safely. Sure, restricting online shopping restricts my access to potential additions to my collections, but it also avoids the risks of buying online – some of which I previously experienced and which led to my marked preference for live shopping. This column deals with some of those risks, for sellers as well as buyers.

Customer who buys but doesn’t remit

This happens occasionally in online auctions. It can occur when a potential buyer gets carried away by a hot bidding war and then discovers not really wanting the item that much when it comes time to pay. If you posted the winning bid, you bought the item. If you don’t know how to control your own bidding, online auctions are probably not for you.

The obverse to this is a seller who has every desire to take your money and no impulse to send the merchandise. Over the years, there have been some well-publicized cases involving sellers who have specialized in this kind of scam.

Merchandise misrepresentation

This may be the most frequent and glaring risk of buying antiques and collectibles online. It never ceases to amaze me how often sundry pieces of no-name glass are represented by a seller as a desirable glassmaker’s work when the only thing the item has in common with the work of the alleged manufacturer is that they’re both made of glass.

But it isn’t only manufacturer misidentification that can be a problem online. Sellers can be blind to defects such as chips and cracks in porcelain and glass. I’m willing to cut sellers a bit of slack on this point since I witnessed an especially surprising dealer blind spot while I was working in an upscale antique store. A regular dealer proudly showed an item the dealer was so proud of because of its allegedly immaculate condition despite its age. The shop’s owner happened to be there at the time, and he and I shared a quick glance at each other because it was immediately obvious to us that there were a few chips and defects in the piece. It was just as clear, though, that even this professional, experienced dealer was so overwhelmed by the allure of the piece itself as to just not see its defects.

 

Coudersport Duck on Nest
This group of angels was offered as Royal Copenhagen in a recent eBay listing. The clues that they are not Royal Copenhagen were several: a very large “blowhole” in the base (which would be not much larger than a pinhole on an authentic RC), the inept modeling of the figures themselves, and a poorly done counterfeit mark on the base. (Image courtesy of eBay)

Sellers who don’t ship safely

There are lots of collector message boards on Facebook, and I’m struck by the number of people who post photos of broken glass from very poorly packaged merchandise they’ve received from an online seller. It takes special effort and care to package porcelain and glass for mailing (an expertise I must admit, with red-faced chagrin, that I myself lack since I sent a slightly damaged porcelain figurine to a restorer that arrived even more damaged because of my inept packaging). The one or two folks I will buy from online are past-masters at packaging glass and porcelain safely. Otherwise, the time and expense of getting a damaged item returned and the sale price reimbursed can take more time and effort, especially from a resistant seller, than the item would ever have been worth had it arrived in pristine condition.

Yes, online posts give collectors increased access to desirable items. But for novice collectors, I would recommend using online sources first for extensive research and education until such time as the collector knows enough to have good buyer instincts and to pay attention when “it just doesn’t look right.”

Peggy Whiteneck is a writer, collector, and dealer living in East Randolph, VT. If you would like to suggest a subject that she can address in her column, email her at  allwritealready2000@gmail.com. ​

A world of Wedgwood

September 2026

Good Eye

A world of Wedgwood

by Peggy Whiteneck

Wedgwood is an English company that makes many patterns of dinnerware. Whole dinnerware sets, of course, are seldom collectible in multiples because of the space that would require. Wedgwood is probably most famous among collectors for its decorative jasper stoneware, featuring relief scenes against an unglazed colored background.

Wedgwood is a very old company; the founder, Josiah Wedgwood, began making jasperware in 1774 (Incidentally, Charles Darwin was Josiah Wedgwood’s grandson! And, Josiah’s granddaughter was Charles Darwin’s wife, making that couple first cousins).

Today, Wedgwood belongs to the Fiskars Group, which also owns other well-known brands such as Georg Jensen, Royal Doulton, Royal Copenhagen, Royal Albert, and Waterford (https://fiskarsgroup.com/). Jasperware is most noted for its raised white scenes against a light blue background, sometimes referred to as “Wedgwood Blue,” but there are several other background colors for Wedgwood jasper, including a dark blue, lilac, green, yellow, crimson, and basalt (black).

Crimson Jasperware is considered rare as it was made in a relatively short window from the late 19th century through its suspension in 1910. Other expensive jasperware uses unusual color combinations, such as the Portland vase of dark blue on pink, and even the current retail pieces on these examples can run up to three and four figures.

The Portland vase, still being made, is an iconic example of Wedgwood jasperware. It has been made in several base colors, including dark blue, light blue, and black. This vase was also made in the rare crimson color with white relief, a genuine antique for which four figure prices are the rule, even for damaged examples. The design was Josiah Wedgwood’s copy of the Barberini vase from Roman antiquity. The Wedgwood relief design continues even to the underside of the base. A large Portland vase, with both the classical relief and background in a color Wedgwood calls “flaxen,” retails at Wedgwood for $18,500!

Jasperware has been imitated, and wannabe items are usually entirely unmarked. Authentic Wedgwood will always be engraved as such on the bottom of its pieces. Be sure the mark’s spelling is correct; even when fake pieces are marked, the mark is often misspelled “Wedgewood” (with a second “e”). AI often also uses this misspelling, so take care in your research!
The themes of decorative reliefs on Wedgwood vary widely, from classic Greek and Roman motifs to leaf and flower decorations to ships and buildings. The variety of relief themes is, to my eyes, one of the most attractive aspects of Wedgwood forms that range from vases to dishes to Christmas ornaments and more. Relief work is applied by hand and shaped by craftsmen who serve an apprenticeship of up to 10 years before becoming master craftspeople.

Most Wedgwood found on the secondary market today will be relatively modern. Letters embossed in the surface of the base were introduced in 1860 as an aid to dating the pieces. The dates began with the letter O and proceeded alphabetically until 1906, repeating the alphabet for subsequent years after “Z.” Any marks after 1891 will have ‘England’ included. You can find a fairly complicated list of older and antique Wedgwood marks at https://fineart-restoration.co.uk/news/identifying-wedgwood-makers-marks-and-dates/. The most expensive secondary market pieces were made in the 19th century or earlier.

Since it is waterproof, jasperware vases can be used to display cut flowers (although I imagine the inside of a Jasperware item could be discolored by standing water if the water has a high mineral content).

“The key is thoughtful use. Avoid dishwashers, microwaves, and extreme temperature changes,” according to heirloomblog.com.
Secondary market prices, such as eBay on the most commonly seen light blue Wedgwood jasperware, can be very affordable as the market has been pretty much glutted. Collectors interested in value are advised to focus on other colors. Whatever its background color, when buying on the secondary market, carefully inspect the relief (as well as the overall form) for chips and nicks, which will affect value.
.

 

Coudersport Duck on Nest

This 19th-century Wedgwood Campana vase in the classic Wedgwood colors of white on light blue sold on eBay in late April for $650. Later and smaller examples of this Wedgwood light blue are much more affordable, many for less than $25. (Image courtesy of the author)

Peggy Whiteneck is a writer, collector, and dealer living in East Randolph, VT. If you would like to suggest a subject that she can address in her column, email her at  allwritealready2000@gmail.com. ​

Antique Dolls from the Stylish and Sophisticated to the Earthy and Eerie

August 2026

Good Eye

Antique Dolls from the Stylish and Sophisticated to the Earthy and Eerie

by Peggy Whiteneck

As with most old toys, antique dolls showing no sign of ever having been played with by a child are the ones that appeal to adult collectors, who are often willing to pay four to six figures for 19th-century examples by famous makers such as Schmitt & Fils, Jumeau, and Simon & Halbig. Look for a maker’s mark on the bisque portions of an antique doll, often found on the back of the neck or head or elsewhere. Such dolls are unlikely to be found in the average shop – but you never can tell what you may be lucky enough to find!

The history of dolls goes back to early centuries BC, and antique dolls can be found in virtually every culture from Africa to Asia. In fact, archaeological evidence indicates dolls were the earliest known toys. While dolls in unused condition are desired by modern collectors, an unused doll in ancient cultures would have been kept from children if it were believed to be charged with magical powers.

Whatever the maker, the most desirable dolls of interest to collectors today are porcelain dolls that have their original clothing and shoes. Knowledgeable collectors will also look for hidden flaws before buying. They may ask, for example, to have the wig removed to inspect the head for cracks or chips. Firing cracks are common in the bisque porcelain that forms the heads of most antique dolls and do not affect value. Firing cracks are jagged and often have a slight space between, say, the back of an ear and the place it attaches to the head, but a straight-line crack across the neck or head is damage, and that will affect value.

The doll companies mentioned in the first paragraph are no longer in business today. But another famed doll maker, Madame Alexander, is still in production. Its dolls date from the 20th century, and while the oldest and rarest of them are exceptional and can sell for thousands of dollars, many Madame Alexander dolls can be purchased for less than $100.

The Antiques Roadshow has an instructive video on determining whether a porcelain-faced doll is antique vs. newer. Antique dolls will usually have moveable glass eyes that look remarkably real, although some well-made newer dolls may also have glass eyes. A better clue is that the face of a newer doll will feel entirely smooth to the touch, whereas an antique’s face will feel slightly grainy.

A doll doesn’t have to be made of porcelain, of course. Children have also played with homegrown dolls such as apple head dolls, corn husk dolls, and rag dolls. For Native Americans, corn was an important staple food source with a spiritual aspect. According to the Los Altos History Museum, the first corn husk dolls were made by Northeastern Native Americans, who made the dolls without faces to reflect a tribal myth as described on the museum’s website. Corn husk dolls were attractive to pioneer-era white families because they were easy and affordable to make from materials at hand. The dolls were also adopted by enslaved African American families because they could be made from husks left over after the harvest season.

 

Coudersport Duck on Nest

This antique Schmitt & Fils doll was found online at Ruby Lane and can be yours for a mere $16,995. But don’t despair! Although museum-quality examples will still cost you at least four figures, you can find lesser-renowned antique dolls on eBay for a couple hundred dollars. (Image courtesy of the author)

Apple head dolls have been described, in an oddly apt contradiction in terms, as “cute and creepy”, at least to adult eyes, since the heads are made of dried-out apples that make the faces wrinkly and craggy. (As I write this, I’m actually reading a mystery novel, The Witch’s Orchard by Archer Sullivan, where these dolls figure as prominent creepy clues).

It can be difficult to ascertain the antique status of an apple head or corn husk doll since they are so easy to make that they are still being made today. Directions for making them are widely available online. Collectors interested in age should therefore mind the age and provenance of what they buy.

Peggy Whiteneck is a writer, collector, and dealer living in East Randolph, VT. If you would like to suggest a subject that she can address in her column, email her at  allwritealready2000@gmail.com. ​

Shake, rattle, and roll!

July 2026

Good Eye

Shake, rattle, and roll!

by Peggy Whiteneck

The oldest rattles date from about 4,500 years ago in the Middle East. Speculation has given them other roles besides toys, such as warding off evil spirits (through the sounds a rattle makes). “But perhaps parents also needed to distract their children now and then so that they could have a bit of peace and quiet to themselves. Today, we use screens; back then it was rattles,” notes archaeologist Mette Marie Hald from the National Museum of Denmark in Copenhagen.

Earliest rattles were made of wood or clay. While early examples are unmarked, those dating from the 18th century and beyond were more likely to be made of silver and should have hallmarks, usually found on the handle mount.

According to the website for the British AC Silver Co. “Early rattles featured coral handles…(because) a coral handle was the perfect antidote for teething babies, as it was both smooth and cool. (Also), coral was considered to be a means of guarding a child against witchcraft,” a belief dating back to Roman times “where babies’ cradles would be festooned with coral hung on string to defer evil forces. Although this practice declined, the reputation of coral as a protective device continued.” Some of these rattles used mother of pearl or ivory handles rather than coral for a baby to chew.

At least intuitively aware that later fancy rattles with multiple pieces could pose hazards to babies playing with them directly, many of the early 18th- and 19th-century examples were made for the belts of moms or nursemaids, where they could be shaken to distract a restive baby rather than given to the baby directly. Some portraits of babies show rattles pinned to their dress or hung around their neck.

Hazards from some rattles have continued into the present day. In 2006, the iconic Tiffany Co. paid a $262,500 fine for failure to report a hazard posed by its silver infant teething rattle. The circular rattle contained a central bar that was vulnerable to breakage and the release of the small animal figures on the bar, which posed a choking risk to babies; in at least one of three reported examples of breakage, a tiny animal was found in the baby’s mouth – luckily, before he had time to swallow it. In the settlement, “Tiffany denies it violated the Consumer Safety Protection Act by failing to report defects with its…rattles in a timely manner.” By the way, these rattles retailed for a mere $150!

The famous Jean-Jacques Rousseau was not a fan of rattles or other toys, not because they were physically dangerous to babies but because they were, shall we say, frivolous. “A little twig covered with its own leaves and fruit, - a poppy-head, in which the seeds can be heard rattling, - a stick of liquorice (sic) he can suck and chew, these will amuse a child quite as well as the splendid baubles, and will not disadvantage him by accustoming him to luxury from his very birth” (Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Émile, ou De l’éducation). 

Coudersport Duck on Nest

This 1762 portrait of Mrs. Jacob Hurd and Child painted by William Johnston (formerly misattributed to John Singleton Copley) is owned by the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Note the baby rattle in the mother’s hand. The orange tip would have been made of coral, considered safer than silver for a baby’s mouth. This style of rattle is often found in internet searches. (Image courtesy of the author)

 

Hmmm…. Today, we might have asked Rousseau to lighten up.

Modern baby rattles are made of safer play materials, such as plastic, silicon, bamboo, and cloth. Sterling silver rattles are still being made, though. One of these, whose maker I won’t embarrass by citing the name, is in the form of a crescent moon whose sharply turned edges look like just the thing for jabbing a baby’s eye while the tyke is mouthing it. In any case, it seems clear that silver baby rattles are better suited to the needs of adult collectors than to the gums of teething babies. Even when the oldest of these rattles were made, parents may have thought the same thing, as many of the oldest rattles can be found today in pristine/unused condition – a collector’s dream!

 

Peggy Whiteneck is a writer, collector, and dealer living in East Randolph, VT. If you would like to suggest a subject that she can address in her column, email her at  allwritealready2000@gmail.com. ​